The Fact About h4831sc That No One Is Suggesting

I gave up on it and went to other powder if the new powder was developing a lot more pressure and was slower compared to the old stuff. I do not try to remember if I even tried using frequent h4831 or not; I'm thinking not.

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's got a shorter grain dimension, thus, the designation SC or brief cut. The shorter, more compact kernels allow the powder to movement throughout the powder steps extra smoothly, helping to ease the frequent slicing of granules.

Can they be interchanged with no problems other then making use of normal load procedures when switching from ton to large amount?

Certainly you may. They may be exactly the same correct powder even so the SC powder is just cut shorter so it meters improved.

Yup or it is not going to function effectively. And For the reason that OP contains a load utilizing Varget I might check out to discover anyone to trade with. Might think of a get earn problem.

Did you ever consider H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Capturing 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with regular chamber. Asking yourself What to anticipate with 215 bergers with H4331sc?

I'm making use of it which has a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 was not as correct. RL22 did very well but I had been a bit concerned about temp security. I do think I'm at 72 grains and get all-around 2850ish fps

and h4831sc load data you might like to put money into some new load data publications. powder composition and chemistry can does change over the years. 4831 powder of decades in the past isn't really identical as what's currently available. that may be why anyone serious about reloading safely will have quite possibly the most latest load data publications to confer with.

I could stack em in one gap but I wasn’t satisfied with the velocity. Just after months, I acquired lucky and caught some H1000 on the net and naturally paid a bit extra. The pretty upcoming week in a gun demonstrate a guy experienced a complete scenario of H1000 for $40 for every 1lb. I fail to remember simply how much, but Using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a moderate load.

Why would I point out this? Just what is my issue? I'm unsure that there's a serious valid stage in addition to exactly what is common with most hasn't been well-known with me in the slightest degree in these conditions. Do I just Have got a powder jinx or some thing? Only to show you how nuts I actually am, tomorrow I'm range testing a close friends new .

Kansas Town, MO I would grab whatsoever is available at the moment. I’ve applied both although with my head over to load h4831sc load data and didn’t see just about anything various functionality clever.

This is often an Excessive extruded propellant and provides heightened insensitivity to cold and warm temperatures.

While IMR 4831 and H4831SC are distinctive powders, you will see that in several scenarios, where by one of these is stated the opposite is going to be likewise. Also, you will find there is a fairly constant relationship between them with regard to stated loads.

The point that the H4831 is in h4831sc truth a slower burning powder is precisely why you are viewing increased velocities attained with that powder, versus what you've observed Together with the IMR things.